Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |
| en:facebook [2022/08/30 15:23] – mansour | en:facebook [2026/10/31 22:15] (current) – correction suite MàJ plugin Mermaid mansour |
|---|
| Ethnographic **reflexivity** is a research method that places the observer under observation: the researcher gathers observations on his own affects in a dedicated part of the fieldbook, and later analyzes them as indications either of the perturbations induced by his presence, or possibly evidence of the affective dimension of local social life. That is the methodology that I tried to export in the context of Taezi society in the years 2000, but it gave way to a series of consequences : | Ethnographic **reflexivity** is a research method that places the observer under observation: the researcher gathers observations on his own affects in a dedicated part of the fieldbook, and later analyzes them as indications either of the perturbations induced by his presence, or possibly evidence of the affective dimension of local social life. That is the methodology that I tried to export in the context of Taezi society in the years 2000, but it gave way to a series of consequences : |
| |
| <flow>flowchart LR; | <mermaid> |
| | raw |
| | flowchart LR; |
| A(Reflexivity<br>August - September 2003) | A(Reflexivity<br>August - September 2003) |
| A-->B(Corporal engagement<br>October 2003) | A-->B(Corporal engagement<br>October 2003) |
| F-->G(Withdrawal<br>November 2010) | F-->G(Withdrawal<br>November 2010) |
| G-->A | G-->A |
| </flow> | </mermaid> |
| This section attempts to describe as precisely as possible this ethnographic interaction, and the relationship it nevertheless managed to establish. It also describes the failure to reach the recognition of this story by Academic institutions. This is the starting point of the following sections. | This section attempts to describe as precisely as possible this ethnographic interaction, and the relationship it nevertheless managed to establish. It also describes the failure to reach the recognition of this story by Academic institutions. This is the starting point of the following sections. |
| |
